China wants to go
back to ‘1959 LAC’
- China urged India to abide by the Line of Actual Control (LAC) position of 1959, following last week’s scuffle between troops of the two countries along the Pangong lake in Ladakh
- China accused Indian troops of undertaking “violent actions” and injuring Chinese personnel.
- China urged India to abide by the “1959 LAC” — an apparent reference to the alignment espoused by former Chinese Premier Zhou en Lai in a letter to Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru.
- In his 2016 book, Choices: Inside the Making of India’s Foreign Policy, former National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon points out that in the proposal of November 1959, the Chinese describe the LAC “only in general terms on maps not to scale”. India rejected the proposal in 1959 and 1962.
- Zhou en Lai then wrote to Nehru that in the eastern sector, the line “coincides in the main with the so-called McMahon Line, and in the western and middle sectors, it coincides in the main with the traditional customary line which has consistently been pointed out by China”
Now, passport sans police verication
- Home Ministry launches the CCTNS Project,which ams to connect the Country's all 15,398 police stations
- The physical police verification for getting a passport may soon be dispensed with as the Centre plans to connect the procedure with the Crime and Criminal Tracking Network and Systems Project (CCTNS), a project first conceptualised by the UPA government in 2009.
- CCTNS, an exhaustive national database of crimes and criminals that will check the antecedents of applicants at the click of a mouse, was expected to be linked with the passport service of the External Affairs Ministry.
National database
- Police will be given handheld devices to go to an applicant’s address and his or her details will be uploaded on the network. It will minimise contact of an individual with police and reduce time (for getting passport)
- The mandate of the CCTNS had been expanded by incorporating citizen-centric services such as
[ii]quick registration
of FIR in any crime and
[iii]connecting
the network with
criminal justice delivery
system.
Will SC end personal laws’ immunity?
- The Supreme Court’s judgment on the constitutionality of triple talaq may also decide the age-old debate whether personal laws can be brought within the ambit of Article 13 (laws inconsistent with or in derogation of, the fundamental rights) of the Constitution.
- While the All India Muslim Personal Law Board ( AIMPLB) has argued that the Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction to strike down provisions of personal law, organisations calling for reform and Muslim women from various walks of life across the country have urged the court to declare triple talaq and polygamy “un-Islamic”
- This is the first time that aggrieved persons — individual Muslim women — themselves have approached the apex court in person to settle the law on whether religious law is immune from constitutional standards enshrined under fundamental rights.
- Article 13 includes in its ambit any “ordinance, order, by-law, rule, regulation, notification and even customs and usages” passed or made by the Legislature or any other “competent authority”. It mandates that any law in force in the country before or after the commencement of Constitution should not violate the fundamental rights of citizens enshrined in Part III.
Discordant notes
In the past, courts have
made discordant notes
about the immunity enjoyed
by personal laws.
- In 1951, the Bombay High Court in State of Bombay versus Narasu Appa Mali held that personal law is not ‘law’ under Article 13. The judgment was never challenged in the Supreme Court
- In Ahmedabad Women Action Group versus Union of India, the Supreme Court was asked to consider that unilateral divorce by talaq and polygamy violated Articles 14 and 15. The court rejected the claim, saying it was for the legislature to determine.
Infosys compliance: SEBI seeks data
- The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is examining whether there were any lapses in corporate governance or disclosure requirements by Infosys.
- The SEBI move comes reportedly after a few shareholders approached the regulator following the resignation of Vishal Sikka as the chief executive officer amidst allegations by cofounder N.R. Narayana Murthy
- The regulator had asked the stock exchanges to look into this matter by seeking clarification from the company. Exchanges, being the firstlevel regulators, often seek clarification from companies based on regulatory directions or media reports.
Impact on buyback?
- The SEBI move could affect the proposed ₹13,000-crore buyback of Infosys shares as well. The regulator could insist on getting a complete clarity on investor complaints before giving a final go-ahead for the buy-back proposal.
Will Infosys face class action law suits in India?
- A class action suit allows a number of claimants, who have a common grouse, to pool their resources and file a suit against a company.
- Such option for company law cases is a well-established principle in foreign jurisdictions, especially in the U.S.
- The Satyam episode forced company law formulators to incorporate a rule providing for such action in India. Section 245 of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for such an option for Indian investors. Such a suit can be filed before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).
- Sec. 245 also gives the option to claim damages or compensation or demand any other suitable action against “the company or its directors for any fraudulent, unlawful or wrongful act or omission or conduct or any likely act or omission or conduct on its or their part.”
- One can sue the firm, its directors, auditors and technical advisers who are party to alleged fraud.
- Once the suit is admitted, NCLT will issue a public notice to allow those not having enough qualifying shares to join. Similar applications in other jurisdictions will be consolidated into a single application.